- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:41:54 -0500
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Thank you, Wayne! On 7/11/16, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > To all. There seems to be a low of confusion between geometric zoom as in > screen magnification and semantic text resizing. Read my latest comments > about geometric zoom vs. semantic text enlargement. Issue 5, Comment, Text > Enlargement is Poorly Understood by the A11y Community. Experience with > screen magnification is not equivalent to semantic text resizing. > > To Laura: Gordon Legge did a 1000% example for the iPad 3. We came up with > the 1100% in verbal communication as we prepared our comments for the > Access Board regarding the 508 Refresh. The Legge comments are recorded on > the written comments to the Access Board on 508. > > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Laura Carlson > <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Hi Wayne, >> >> Thanks for the example. >> >> Were you able to find the specific reference to Gordon Legge's study >> that cited 1100 percent? >> >> Kindest regards, >> Laura >> >> On 7/10/16, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: >> > The size 1100% seems crazy o first glance, but it is very practical for >> > reading. I first thought of getting all logical, but an example is >> better. >> > Look at WCAG 1.4.8 Issue #5. I have included a screen shot of 1100% >> > enlargement of 16px on a 22 inch screen. It looks like a reasonable >> reading >> > interface to me. >> > >> > Take a look. https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues/5 >> > >> > Wayne >> > >> >> >> -- >> Laura L. Carlson >> > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:42:28 UTC