Laura, Am I dreaming...or does Issue 10 (Interactive Element Contrast (Minimum) now pass all of the requirements (per David MacDonald) for a reasonable SC? See all the yeses here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XShLFX8fxHYYLn8A6avDwu37w9JfnZCGWvAKBpK9Xo4/edit#gid=0 (If I am reading this correctly...then I will need to break out the happy dance music. Even if that is true...there are still refinements to be made...but this would make me feel AWESOME about our progress.) G glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello Low Vision Task Force, > > As we discussed on the call today David MacDonald's December 15, 2016 > email to the WCAG WG and his spreadsheet indicate that many of the > LVTF SCs lack SC acceptance criteria. > > I have made a list of them on the Wiki: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/David_ > MacDonald_SC_Notes_on_LVTF_SCs > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > >
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2016 17:46:02 UTC