Re: uri4uri.net

+1 to renew


Le jeu. 20 févr. 2020 à 13:06, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
>
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 12:47, Christöpher Gutteridge <totl@soton.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> For an April 1st joke in 2013 I set up this site; http://uri4uri.net/
>>
>> While it was a joke, it is an interesting idea; it takes a URI and pulls
>> it apart and describes it in RDF. This means giving RDF identifiers to
>> mimetypes, file suffixes, domains and protocols etc.
>>
>> However it's time to decide if I should renew the DNS for it and I
>> thought I'd see if the community still thinks this is an interesting
>> demo worth preserving. If there's any positive noise at all I'll renew
>> it, but maybe it's just junk now...
>>
>
> It's actually the best whois lookup that ive seen
>
> Headers would be even better
>
> The key thing i learnt about "advanced" linked data, is that RDF about a
> URI is different from RDF as the content.  ie data vs meta data.
>
> A good design cleanly separates the two.  Which is surprisingly uncommon
> on the web.
>
> +1 to renew
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Gutteridge <totl@soton.ac.uk>
>> You should read our team blog at http://blog.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 20 February 2020 14:11:11 UTC