Re: "undefined" URI scheme

This seems like a perfect use case for nanopublications <
http://nanopub.org/wordpress/?page_id=65>

As Christopher suggests, a start might be to assign potentially useful URIs
based on UUIDs. But then the trick is to associate contextual metadata that
"explain" the node (for machines and/or humans).

John

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:16 AM Christopher Gutteridge <totl@soton.ac.uk>
wrote:

> This is dangerous as 2 datasets are very likely to use the same URI to
> mean something different.
>
> RDF already has the concept of blank nodes, eg _:foo, _:bar which only
> exist within the current dataset and are explicitly not used for
> linking. These cause a lot of headaches and I try to avoid them in all
> my systems.
>
> You could do worse than generate UUID (numbers big enough to
> statistically never ever clash if you pick them randomly), and just use
> <urn:uuid:7673868d-231e-490d-9c4f-19288e7e668f> as URIs. This is ugly
> but only us nerds should ever see them.
>
>
> On 19/11/2018 10:55, Laura Morales wrote:
> > Full original thread here:
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Furi%2F2018Nov%2F0000.html&amp;data=01%7C01%7Ctotl%40soton.ac.uk%7C49e1846f6579438de24d08d64e0e11db%7C4a5378f929f44d3ebe89669d03ada9d8%7C1&amp;sdata=c%2FbGGSAnTM5dv%2BF0E9UnookUETKwFMusjxDFuF0V4%2FQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > Since I was asked to redirect my request to the "RDF community" I'm
> posting here for comments, because I don't know if there is any official
> place to ask to.
> >
>
> --
> Christopher Gutteridge <totl@soton.ac.uk>
> You should read our team blog at http://blog.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>
>

-- 
John S. Erickson, Ph.D.
Director of Operations, The Rensselaer IDEA
Deputy Director, Web Science Research Center (RPI)
<http://idea.rpi.edu/> <olyerickson@gmail.com>
Twitter & Skype: olyerickson