- From: Matt Wallis <matt@solidarityeconomics.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:37:27 +0000
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <b7741d7b-1ac6-1b12-04f1-fe13f36c9558@solidarityeconomics.org>
On 13/01/2017 12:58, Brian McBride wrote: > > > > On 13/01/17 10:48, Phil Archer wrote: > [...] >> >> The latter is a reference to the ORG Ontology, >> https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ which is what you probably want. So >> I'd do this: >> >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> a >> org:FormalOrganization, my:Thing . > My reading of Matt's message is that he is trying to link *instances* > of my:Thing to instances in the Companies House RDF, viz: > > my:object a my:Thing . > my:object predicate > <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . Yes, I do want to link instances. Looking now again at Phil Archer's suggestion, above, I see (if I understand it correctly) that it does not say which instance of my:Thing is linked to <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948>. > > Matt: amongst the predicates you might use is: > > my:object owl:sameAs <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . > > This is a very strong statement in that it says the your object is > identical to the thing identified by the Companies House URL. Every > property of my:object is also a property of the companies house > resource and vice versa. There is the possibility that there could be > subtle modelling differences between your object and the Companies > House one. If that is the case, don't use owl:sameAs. From previous reading, I am cautious about using owl:sameAs. It may turn out that this is the correct relationship, but I won't use it unless I am absolutely sure. > > An alternative is: > > my:object rdfs:seeAlso > <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . > > This is a much, much weaker statement. rdfs:seeAlso provides a link > but with no formal meaning. Its definition says: > > [[ > that is used to indicate a resource that might provide additional > information about the subject resource. > ]] > > So if you want to make an assertion when you make the link, > rdfs:seeAlso doesn't cut it. > > Neither of these is UK specific. > > Others on the list may provide further suggestions with more suitable > meaning. A good thing to think about would be "what am I trying to > say when I assert this link". What I am trying to assert is that one can expect to find information about the formal company registration of a particular instance of my:Thing. I want to provide the link so that properties of the company registration can be retrieved for a particular instance of my:Thing. I want it to be specifically about company registration, so I think rdfs:seeAlso is too general. > > owl:sameAs says roughly - "these URIs identify exactly the same thing". > > rdfs:seeAlso says roughly - "retrieving this link might get you more data" > > Brian Thank you for your help. -- Matt Wallis Institute for Solidarity Economics http://www.solidarityeconomics.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 14:38:05 UTC