- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:44:46 -0400
- To: james anderson <james@dydra.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
On 06/08/2016 11:46 AM, james anderson wrote: > if the goal is to leave room for the judgement call, > assuming that dimension is free, to place each in its own graph gives > one the latitude to make the judgement call, develop some systematic > which depends on provenance, reflect the question to a manual choice, or > just project FROM both and allow a naive merge. Absolutely agree. > > which would see to make it the general best practice. > is there some case which argues against it? Not AFAIK. I think named graphs are one of the best tools that we have available, and should be considered a best practice. I just meant to caution that named graphs may not *fully* solve the problem. But they are the best starting point, IMO. David Booth
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 18:45:15 UTC