W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > August 2016

RE: Unacceptable (was Re: CFP - IEEE Technically Sponsored Computing Conference 2017 (London))

From: William Van Woensel <William.Van.Woensel@Dal.Ca>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:40:19 +0000
To: "Brian.Ulicny@thomsonreuters.com" <Brian.Ulicny@thomsonreuters.com>, "Paul_Courtney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU" <Paul_Courtney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU>, "phila@w3.org" <phila@w3.org>
CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DM2PR03MB462883134419C6EEC5AD51FD4ED0@DM2PR03MB462.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Well, I would leave that up to the discretion of the W3C's Data Activity Lead.

Personally, I think it's advantageous for the following reason: it makes clear to mailing list recipients that the spam message was appropriately dealt with, which is important to retain recipients who don't like spam (I'm thinking most don't). Speaking for myself, I don't get any kind of "smug" satisfaction from it (as implied by Paul), rather a confirmation that there's a good spam policy in place.


Regards,

William

From: Brian.Ulicny@thomsonreuters.com [mailto:Brian.Ulicny@thomsonreuters.com]
Sent: August-25-16 6:13 PM
To: William Van Woensel <William.Van.Woensel@Dal.Ca>; Paul_Courtney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU; phila@w3.org
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: RE: Unacceptable (was Re: CFP - IEEE Technically Sponsored Computing Conference 2017 (London))

Couldn't the response be made to the individuals spamming rather than the list as a whole?

Brian Ulicny
________________________________
From: William Van Woensel [William.Van.Woensel@Dal.Ca]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:34 AM
To: Courtney, Paul K.; Phil Archer
Cc: public-lod@w3.org<mailto:public-lod@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Unacceptable (was Re: CFP - IEEE Technically Sponsored Computing Conference 2017 (London))

I don't see how Phil's comments qualify as "snarky", "rude" or "smug". He's simply vocalizing the current W3C spam-policy (established by majority vote of people *on this list*) that should have been put in place a long time ago. Everyone was duly notified of this, and it is clearly indicated on the mailinglist page<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/> - at least, for people who take the effort to have a look at it (or, perish the thought, register to the mailing list!) instead of just doing a drive-by-shooting of CFPs.





Regards,



William



-----Original Message-----
From: Courtney, Paul K. [mailto:Paul_Courtney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU]
Sent: August-25-16 11:12 AM
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>; Supriya Kapoor <supriya.kapoor@thesai.org<mailto:supriya.kapoor@thesai.org>>
Cc: public-lod@w3.org<mailto:public-lod@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Unacceptable (was Re: CFP - IEEE Technically Sponsored Computing Conference 2017 (London))



Phil,



I've been watching you from the sidelines be the sole vocal arbiter on the matter of CFP and I really don't understand the need you have to be unprofessional, rude, and snarky each and every time. This does nothing in my opinion but create an atmosphere of smug satisfaction for those who agree with you and dread for those who don't.



Cheers,



Paul





:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:



Paul K. Courtney, MS

Applications Specialist/Biomedical Informaticist Information Systems in support of the Stem Cell Transplant Program Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

T: 617.582.7389

C: 603.727.8171





F: 617.632.4030



On 8/25/16, 5:13 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>> wrote:



    Dear Supriya Kapoor,



    Your message to this and two other W3C lists is pure spam.



    See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2016May/0032.html.







    --





    Phil Archer

    W3C Data Activity Lead

    http://www.w3.org/2013/data/



    http://philarcher.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__philarcher.org&d=CwMGaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=MWFkXZKGzjUiPsZJmvKkJFzcfjNv8b2-O-FtVxe_lKo&m=DvwjCKp6_hUPUH6_oL0PvAhbk7AEEkwgJLxKDg-WZkw&s=zcPG4OPBBUI_v6H67xZpgxJoXgGF0ClVsn-iaK37Wm0&e=>

    +44 (0)7887 767755

    @philarcher1











The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.partners.org_complianceline&d=CwMGaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk-GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=MWFkXZKGzjUiPsZJmvKkJFzcfjNv8b2-O-FtVxe_lKo&m=DvwjCKp6_hUPUH6_oL0PvAhbk7AEEkwgJLxKDg-WZkw&s=4XhZw17V03BH0VGaVetAKzmY9K3ZRFCX2ri_U1UsEp8&e=> . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2016 21:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:34 UTC