- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:05:50 +0000
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Also note that Schema.org will have a solution in their next release: http://sdo-gozer.appspot.com/mainEntityOfPage http://sdo-gozer.appspot.com/mainEntity Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Martynas Jusevičius [mailto:martynas@graphity.org] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 11:58 AM > To: Svensson, Lars > Cc: Kingsley Idehen; public-lod@w3.org > Subject: Re: Profiles in Linked Data > > I think foaf:primaryTopic/foaf:isPrimaryTopic of is a good convention for linking > abstract concepts/physical things to documents about them. > We use it extensively in our datasets. For example: > > <some/resource#this> a bibo:Book ; > foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf <some/resource/dcat> , <some/resource/premis> . > > <some/resource/dcat> a foaf:Document ; > foaf:primaryTopic <some/resource#this> . > > <some/resource/premis> a foaf:Document ; > foaf:primaryTopic <some/resource#this> . > > Hope this helps. > > Martynas > graphityhq.com > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: > > Kingsley, > > > >> Hope this live example helps, in regards to understanding the issue > >> at hand. Basically, what a document describes is distinct from the > >> shape and form of its content. > > > > We're totally on the same page here, but I need a way to negotiate the shape > and the form of the description and that must in some way refer back to the > entity it describes. > > > > Lars > > > > Still trying to understand > >
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 16:06:23 UTC