- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 17:57:44 +0200
- To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
I think foaf:primaryTopic/foaf:isPrimaryTopic of is a good convention
for linking abstract concepts/physical things to documents about them.
We use it extensively in our datasets. For example:
<some/resource#this> a bibo:Book ;
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf <some/resource/dcat> , <some/resource/premis> .
<some/resource/dcat> a foaf:Document ;
foaf:primaryTopic <some/resource#this> .
<some/resource/premis> a foaf:Document ;
foaf:primaryTopic <some/resource#this> .
Hope this helps.
Martynas
graphityhq.com
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:
> Kingsley,
>
>> Hope this live example helps, in regards to understanding the issue at
>> hand. Basically, what a document describes is distinct from the shape
>> and form of its content.
>
> We're totally on the same page here, but I need a way to negotiate the shape and the form of the description and that must in some way refer back to the entity it describes.
>
> Lars
>
> Still trying to understand
>
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 15:58:11 UTC