- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:17:03 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <554CD36F.7080301@openlinksw.com>
On 5/8/15 10:24 AM, john.walker@semaku.com wrote: > Hi Lars > > *From:* Svensson, Lars <mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de> > *Sent:* Friday, 8 May 2015 11:05 > *To:* Martynas Jusevičius <mailto:martynas@graphity.org> > *Cc:* public-lod@w3.org <mailto:public-lod@w3.org> > > Martynas, > > > To my understanding, in a resource-centric model resources have a > > description containing statements available about them. > > > > When you try split it into parts, then you involve documents or graphs > > and go beyond the resource-centric model. > > OK, I can understand that. Does that mean that if I have under the > same URI serve different representations (e. g. rdf/xml, turtle and > xhtml+RDFa) all those representations must return exactly the same > triples, or would it be allowed to use schema.org in the RDFa, W3C > Organisation Ontology for rdf/xml and foaf when returning turtle? > After all it's different descriptions of the same resource. > > My take on this is each representation (with negotiation only on > format via HTTP Accept header) *should* contain the same set of RDF > statements (triples). > Also one could define a different URL for each representation which > can be linked to with Content-Location in the HTTP headers. > > We’re you to introduce an additional (orthogonal) way to negotiate a > certain profile, this would be orthogonal to the format. Following on > from above, one could then have a separate URL for each format-profile > combination. Yes. For the sake of additional clarity, how about speaking about documents and content-types rather than "representation" which does inevitably conflate key subtleties, in regards to RDF (Language, Notations, and Serialization Formats)? Links: { <> a schema:WebPage ; schema:mentions <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Serialization>, <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Notation>, <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Language> ; skos:related <http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/https/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/0065.html>, <http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/https/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/0058.html>, <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0391.html> . <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0391.html> a schema:WebPage ; rdfs:label "Rough draft poem: Document what art thou?" . } -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 15:17:26 UTC