- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 11:17:03 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <554CD36F.7080301@openlinksw.com>
On 5/8/15 10:24 AM, john.walker@semaku.com wrote:
> Hi Lars
>
> *From:* Svensson, Lars <mailto:L.Svensson@dnb.de>
> *Sent:* Friday, 8 May 2015 11:05
> *To:* Martynas Jusevičius <mailto:martynas@graphity.org>
> *Cc:* public-lod@w3.org <mailto:public-lod@w3.org>
>
> Martynas,
>
> > To my understanding, in a resource-centric model resources have a
> > description containing statements available about them.
> >
> > When you try split it into parts, then you involve documents or graphs
> > and go beyond the resource-centric model.
>
> OK, I can understand that. Does that mean that if I have under the
> same URI serve different representations (e. g. rdf/xml, turtle and
> xhtml+RDFa) all those representations must return exactly the same
> triples, or would it be allowed to use schema.org in the RDFa, W3C
> Organisation Ontology for rdf/xml and foaf when returning turtle?
> After all it's different descriptions of the same resource.
>
> My take on this is each representation (with negotiation only on
> format via HTTP Accept header) *should* contain the same set of RDF
> statements (triples).
> Also one could define a different URL for each representation which
> can be linked to with Content-Location in the HTTP headers.
>
> We’re you to introduce an additional (orthogonal) way to negotiate a
> certain profile, this would be orthogonal to the format. Following on
> from above, one could then have a separate URL for each format-profile
> combination.
Yes.
For the sake of additional clarity, how about speaking about documents
and content-types rather than "representation" which does inevitably
conflate key subtleties, in regards to RDF (Language, Notations, and
Serialization Formats)?
Links:
{
<>
a schema:WebPage ;
schema:mentions <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Serialization>,
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Notation>,
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Language> ;
skos:related
<http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/https/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/0065.html>,
<http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/https/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/0058.html>,
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0391.html> .
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0391.html>
a schema:WebPage ;
rdfs:label "Rough draft poem: Document what art thou?" .
}
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 8 May 2015 15:17:26 UTC