- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 17:59:06 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C LOD Mailing List <public-lod@w3.org>
Thanks, and thanks for all the answers so far. > On 23 Jan 2015, at 16:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > Not sure where you are going, but you are probably interested in > linksets - as a way to package equivalence relations - typically in a > graph of its own. Thanks - I have a lot of linksets :-) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#describing-linksets > > > > To answer the questions: > > Q1: d) in subject, property, object, or multiple of those. I don’t understand where property comes in for using owl:sameAs (or whatever) in stating equivalence between URIs, so I’ll read that as c) > > > Q2: No. We already reuse existing vocabularies and external > identifiers, and there could be a nested structure which is only > indirectly connected to "our" URIs. I realise that this second question wasn’t as clear as it might have been. What I meant was concerned with the sameAs triples only (as was explicit for Q1). So, to elaborate, if you have decided that: http://mysite.com/foo, http://dbpedia.org/resource/foo, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05195d8 are aligned (the same), then what do the triples describing that look like? In particular, do you have any that look like <http://dbpedia.org/resource/foo> owl:sameAs <http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05195d8> . (or vice versa), or do you equivalent everything to a “mysite” URI? But I guess for OpenPHACTS this doesn’t apply, since I understand from what you say below that you never mint a URI of your own where you know there is an external one. Although it does beg the question, perhaps, of what you do when you alter find equivalences. Best Hugh > > <http://example.com/our/own> pav:authoredBy > <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718> . > <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718> foaf:name "Stian Soiland-Reyes" . > > It's true you would also get the second triple from ORCID (remember > content negotiation!), but it's very useful for presentation and query > purposes to include these directly, e.g. in a VOID file. > > In most cases we do however not have any "our URIs" except for > provenance statements. But perhaps Open PHACTS is special in that > regard as we are integrating other people's datasets and shouldn't be > making up any data of our own. :) > > > > Perhaps also of interest: > > In the Open PHACTS project <http://www.openphacts.org/> we use this > extensively - we let the end-user choose which linksets of weak and > strong equivalences they want to apply when a query is made. Such a > collection of linksets and their application we call a "lense" - so > you apply lenses to merge/unmerge your data. See > http://www.slideshare.net/alasdair_gray/gray-compcoref > > > In our identity mapping service > <http://www.openphacts.org/about-open-phacts/how-does-open-phacts-work/identities-within-open-phacts> > we pass in several parameters - the minimal is the URI to map. > > See http://openphacts.cs.man.ac.uk:9092/QueryExpander/mapURI and use > http://rdf.ebi.ac.uk/resource/chembl/targetcomponent/CHEMBL_TC_2443 as > the URI. > > > We also have a piece of magic that can rewrite a SPARQL query to use > the mapped URIs for a given variable (adding FILTER statements) try - > http://openphacts.cs.man.ac.uk:9092/QueryExpander/ > > > > > On 23 January 2015 at 11:39, Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org> wrote: >> I would be really interested to know, please. >> I suggest answers by email, and I’ll report back eventually. >> >> Here goes: >> Imagine you have some of your own RDF using URIs on your base/domain. >> And you have reconciled some of your URIs against some other stuff, such as dbpedia, freebase, geonames... >> Now, visualise the owl:sameAs (or skos:whatever) triples you have made to represent that. >> >> Q1: Where are your URIs? >> a) subject, b) object, c) both >> Q2: Do all the triples have one of your URIs in them? >> a) yes, b) no >> >> It’s just for a choice I have about the input format for sameAs services, so I thought I would ask :-) >> >> Best >> Hugh >> -- >> Hugh Glaser >> 20 Portchester Rise >> Eastleigh >> SO50 4QS >> Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155, Home: +44 23 8061 5652 >> >> >> > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > -- Hugh Glaser 20 Portchester Rise Eastleigh SO50 4QS Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155, Home: +44 23 8061 5652
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 17:59:32 UTC