- From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:59:24 +0100 (CET)
- To: Steffen Lohmann <steffen.lohmann@vis.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <357269016.2777235.1420801164699.open-xchange@oxweb03.eigbox.net>
Hi Steffen, I see under Selection Details that there is a count of instances when a class is selected. Is there any option to show other otherwise enumerate the instances of a class? Maybe showing the instances in the graph might clutter things up (could add a filter for this), but simply adding a list of links under Selection Details would be a good start. This would be useful if the ontology contains, for example, code lists. John > On January 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM Steffen Lohmann > <steffen.lohmann@vis.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote: > > > On 05.01.2015 16:29, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > This is great stuff! > > Thank you, Stian. We are glad to hear that. > > > I tried it with my ontology PAV - and it seems it is struggling a bit > > because PAV (deliberately) don't have a defined domain and range on > > object properties: > > > > http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.org/pav/ > > > > Hence everything goes from and to Thing in the centre, which makes it > > a bit clotted - I could not use the "Gravity" setting to space out the > > properties. > > > > In our manually made diagram I show this using additional "vague" > > resource boxes - perhaps each "unbound" property could just get an > > empty dotted box on the outside instead of going back to Thing? > > > > http://pav-ontology.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/images/pav-overview.png > > If there is a large set of properties without domain and range axioms in > an ontology, the current WebVOWL rendering is indeed not perfect. Your > PAV ontology is a good example for this. We will think about possible > alternatives to adapt or extend the splitting rules of VOWL 2 - > http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/v2/#splittingRules . > > > Here's a nice view that I liked, using PROV-O > > > > http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o > > The visualization is nice but not 100% complete yet, as the current > WebVOWL implementation does not render properties with multiple domain > or range axioms properly at the moment (e.g., the property "hadActivity" > has more than one domain). We are working on that issue and it will > likely be resolved in the next WebVOWL release. > > > Is it possible to turn off the "Subclass of" label and only show the line? > > Several people asked for that already, so we plan to include some kind > of "expert mode" with a "reduced notation" in the next WebVOWL release. > However, we do not want to remove that label from the initial > visualization, as it clarifies the direction of the subclass relation > and is important to make VOWL understandable to casual users, as we > found out in our evaluations - see our papers on VOWL linked at > http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/v2/#references > > > Would it be possible to save a link to a particular view (without > > having to save the SVG)? That navigation state fits much better in > > the # parameters than the iri= I would belive. > > This is a tricky question, as it would require to save the node > positions of the VOWL graph in an annotated JSON or the like. The > current VOWL-JSON is not optimized for that, but we may incorporate such > a feature in one of the next releases (though I cannot promise). > > > I know it's not a proper ontology - yet people still like it for some > > reason. Here however it fails with "Ontology could not be loaded. > > Conversion failed. " > > > > http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.org/dc/terms/ > > This is because the vocabulary misses some OWL constructs that are > expected by WebVOWL (e.g., an ontology IRI). We will try to fix it and > also allow the parsing of such RDFS vocabularies in the next WebVOWL > release. > > Many thanks again for your feedback - very useful, > Steffen > > > > On 19 December 2014 at 15:49, Steffen Lohmann > > <steffen.lohmann@vis.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our > >> OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers without any > >> installation so that ontologies can be instantly visualized. Check it out > >> at:http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl.html > >> > >> To the best of our knowledge, WebVOWL is the first comprehensive ontology > >> visualization completely based on open web standards (HTML, SVG, CSS, > >> JavaScript). It implements VOWL 2, which has been designed in a > >> user-oriented process and is clearly specified at > >> http://vowl.visualdataweb.org (incl. references to scientific papers). > >> > >> Please note that: > >> - WebVOWL is a tool for ontology visualization, not for ontology modeling. > >> - VOWL considers many language constructs of OWL but not all of them yet. > >> - VOWL focuses on the visualization of the TBox of small to medium-size > >> ontologies but does not sufficiently support the visualization of very > >> large > >> ontologies and detailed ABox information for the time being. > >> - WebVOWL 0.3 implements the VOWL 2 specification nearly completely, but > >> the > >> current version of the OWL2VOWL converter does not. > >> These issues are subject to future work. > >> > >> Have fun with it! > >> > >> On behalf of the VOWL team, > >> Steffen > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Steffen Lohmann . Visualization and Interactive Systems (VIS) > >> University of Stuttgart . Universitaetstrasse 38 . D-70569 Stuttgart > >> Phone: +49 711 685-88438 .http://www.vis.uni-stuttgart.de/~lohmansn > >> > >
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 10:59:51 UTC