- From: Martin Voigt <martin.voigt@ontos.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:32:10 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Hi all, interesting discussion. For my working regarding FB, I distinguish three key aspects that are strongly related in the concept of FB: 1) The kind of (meta) data The main principle is based on the principle of Faceted Classification [1]. I also like to refer to Yee et al [2] who built in my opinion the first FB. - data is composed of orthogonal sets of categories - data (or an individual facet value) may be flat (“by Pablo Picasso”) or hierarchical (“located in Vienna > Austria > Europe”) - data (or an individual facet value) may be singlevalued or multi-valued. Having the RDF data model as foundation, this definition will fit well. 2) Query Queries against the (meta) data are not leading to a non-empty result sets. Since the SPARQL queries could easily led to empty results, something like a pre-execution is required to avoid that. Thus, tools like Solr or Eleastic Search come in to play... 3) The UI Faceted browsing is a suitable approach to assist end-users in searching within a mostly unknown data space. They always filter the collection by selecting only from existing characteristics of the remaining items. This is easier to handle than a free, textual query specification and it assures not to deliver an empty result set. Since the paradigm is widely used in e-commerce application (amazon, ebay,...), also end-user know it well. The rest are implementation specific details, that, in my opinion are good starting point to specify criteria for you investigation, e.g., - data access: single endpoint or multiple - schema: are RDF schemas required or not - data caching: direct access to endpoints or with an indexer - facet representation - result representation ... Since I'm also interested in an end-user friendly solution to browse Linked Data sets, I'd like to support the investigation, if possible. Cheers, Martin 1: http://www.upriss.org.uk/papers/iccs00.pdf 2: http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/papers/flamenco-chi03.pdf Am 27.04.2015 um 21:08 schrieb Kingsley Idehen: > On 4/27/15 9:02 AM, Christian Morbidoni wrote: >> Honestly I got a bit stuck asking myself "What exactly am I looking >> for"? In other words: what is exactly a faceted browser for RDF data? > Great point! > > All: > > What is "Faceted Browsing" ? > > What are the distinguishing characteristics (features, properties, > attributes) of a Class of Thing referred to literally as a "Faceted > Browser" ? > > If we cannot build a useful discussion thread based on this, what are we > saying to both ourselves and the rest of the world re., the usefulness > of the following: > > [1] RDF Language > > [2] Linked Open Data constructed using RDF Language. > > It's the year 2015, we can (and MUST) do better. > > Let's get some responses going, in the form of attributes and associated > comments describing said attributes literally, at the very least. > -- ------------------------------- Martin Voigt Stv. Geschäftsführer Ontos GmbH Mobil: +49 178 40 222 58 Telefon: +49 341 21559-10 Telefax: +49 341 21559-11 Email: martin.voigt@ontos.com Skype: m.voigt.1982 http://www.ontos.com Geschäftsführer: Daniel Hladky Registergericht: Amtsgericht Leipzig Registernummer: HRB 25146 Steuernummer: 232/115/02398?
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 07:32:36 UTC