- From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:30:01 +0200
- To: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>
- Cc: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Message-ID: <20140920163000.GA24973@netestate.de>
Hello Paul, or why don't we just acknowledge that whether your knowledge representation 1) has a formal semantics 2) has a formal syntax 3) is more or less expressive is a matter of the task at hand. The whole Web already *is* linked data and I wonder if one day when we will have the perfect RDF, it will be obsolete. Of course - per the above - it would still have its use cases. Regards, Michael Brunnbauer On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:25:43AM -0400, Paul Houle wrote: > Why don't we just reorganize RDF to look like the predicate calculus, let > the arity > 2, and then say it is something new so we can escape the RDF > name. > > In fact, let's just call it "ISO Common Logic", > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_logic > > Most of the "cool kids" weren't around in the 1980s so they don't have the > bad taste in their mouth left by the predicate calculus. > > I don't see any problem with extending SPARQL to arity > 2 facts, we can > let OWL dry and blow away. > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > +1, nicely put Kingsley > > --Gannon > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Fri, 9/19/14, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: A Distributed Economy -- A blog involving Linked Data > > To: public-lod@w3.org > > Date: Friday, September 19, 2014, 5:48 PM > > > > > > On 9/19/14 4:38 PM, > > Brent Shambaugh > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Manu Sporny's post titled "Building > > Linked Data into the Core > > of the Web" > > > > [ > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments/2014Sep/0063.html] > > led to the question: > > > > > > is linked data and semantic web tech useful? I > > think so. I > > can only speak from my own perspective and > > experience. > > > > > > > > Brent, > > > > > > > > Pasting my reply to Manu (with some editing) here, as I > > think its > > important: > > > > > > > > Manu, > > > > > > > > > > It is misleading (albeit inadvertent in regards to your > > post above) > > to infer that Linked Data isn't already the core of > > the Web. The > > absolute fact of the matter is that Linked Data has been > > the core of > > the Web since it was an idea [1][2]. > > > > > > > > > > The Web doesn't work at all if HTTP URIs aren't > > names for: > > > > > > > > > > [1] What exists on the Web > > > > > > [2] What exists, period. > > > > > > > > > > We just have the misfortune of poor communications > > mucking up proper > > comprehension of AWWW. For example, RDF should have been > > presented > > to the world as an effort by the W3C to standardize an > > existing > > aspect of the Web i.e., the ability to leverage HTTP > > URIs as > > mechanisms for: > > > > > > > > > > 1. entity identification & naming > > > > > > 2. entity description using sentences or statements -- > > where (as is > > the case re., natural language) a sentence or statement > > is comprised > > of a subject, predicate, and object. > > > > > > > > > > Instead, we ended up with an incomprehensible, > > indefensible, and at > > best draconian narrative that has forever tainted the > > letters > > "R-D-F" . And to compount matters, > > "HttpRange-14" has become > > censorship tool (based on its ridiculous history), that > > blurs fixing > > this horrible state of affairs. > > > > > > > > > > Links: > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://bit.ly/10Y9FL1 > > -- Evidence that Linked Data was always at the core of > > the Web > > (excuse some instability on my personal data space > > instance, at this > > point in time, should you encounter issues looking up > > the document > > identified by this HTTP URI) > > > > > > > > > > [2] > > http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/03/world-wide-web-25-years-later.html > > -- World Wide Web, 25 years later > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/04/b4/79/04b4794ccf2b6fd14ed3c822be26382f.jpg > > -- Illustrating identification (naming) on the Web (re., > > things that > > exist on or off the Web medium) . > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Kingsley Idehen > > Founder & CEO > > OpenLink Software > > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > > Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Paul Houle > Expert on Freebase, DBpedia, Hadoop and RDF > (607) 539 6254 paul.houle on Skype ontology2@gmail.com > http://legalentityidentifier.info/lei/lookup -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Saturday, 20 September 2014 16:30:24 UTC