- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:19:09 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- CC: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Message-ID: <543E9E7D.6050402@geodan.nl>
On 2014-10-13 14:32, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > re > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:14:27PM +0200, John Walker wrote: >> See this example: >> http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/qualified-relation.html > See also: http://www.w3.org/wiki/PropertyReificationVocabulary Very interesting! This addition would make the approach of creating a class for a relationship that needs annotation more attractive. As Michael kindly pointed out, this could be an answer to my earlier question about being able to relate an original property (foaf:based_near for example) to a custom class. I was struck by this comment from Richard Cyganiak: "It might be interesting to also add some standard properties that can be used on a reified instance to denote its temporal scope, e.g. from when until when the instance is valid. This would provide a fairly natural and unobstrusive method of reconstructing past states of an RDF graph." I find the thought of having standard properties for valid time (one way or the other) appealing. I also like to link to http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/node/101, another good read on the subject. Regards, Frans > > Regards, > > Michael Brunnbauer > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Frans Knibbe Geodan President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 16:19:39 UTC