- From: Julien Plu <julien.plu@redaction-developpez.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:45:47 +0100
- To: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAE94aYVn4gJ6vzN60qeoXn0mvOVMeTTXs3UCnmjUqaNY-ssGKw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks guys for you answer ! @Luca : In my ontology my property is well defined with a range of "owl:Class". @Bernard : I didn't know that Protégé was like that, it's interesting to know it. Your solution cannot be good for me because a lemma must be an instance because I have also another link like : dbonto:City oll:hasLexicalisation oll:ville_1 . But anyway it doesn't matter if I have a OWL full ontology because I didn't planned to reasone with for now. @François : thanks for the link, I gonna check that and see if it's linked with what I'm doing. Best. Julien. 2014-03-03 16:35 GMT+01:00 François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@lirmm.fr>: > Salut Julien, > > you might be interested by the Lexinfo project http://www.lexinfo.net/ > which provides a vocabulary for attaching lexical information to > ontologies. > > François > > > Le 03/03/2014 09:57, Julien Plu a écrit : > > Hello, >> >> I try to create an ontology to lexicalize the french language. And in my >> vocabulary I link a lemma to his meaning which come from DBpedia ontology, >> more precisely a meaning is a DBpedia class. For example : >> >> oll:ville_1 >> >> a oll:Lemma ; >> oll:hasMeaning dbonto:City . >> >> Unfortunatelly when I try my ontology with Protégé, it told me this >> instance is an error. The property "oll:hasMeaning" has a range which is >> "owl:Class". >> >> So my question is, is-it possible to do that ? If yes that come from >> certainly of a bug in Protégé, if no by which way I can define this ? >> >> Don't hesitate to ask if I was not clear enough. >> >> Thanks in advance for any help. >> >> Best. >> >> Julien. >> > > >
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 15:46:40 UTC