Re: Evaluation of ontology reuse choices in real-world scenarios

I have been trying to find a similar evaluation tool, but since each 
domain is different, and measuring degree of domain-coverage is 
application dependent, this is difficult and subjective.
The only tool I found, based on quality metrics, is OOPS! Pitfall 
scanner. This will tell you the number and type of bad design choices in 
each ontology. However, domain-wise, you will have to assess by your own 
criteria.

Best,
Natalia

-- 
   Natalia Díaz Rodríguez.  PhD. Student, Computer Engineering
   Department of IT. Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
   Dept. of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence. University of Granada, Spain
   +34 669685055
   https://research.it.abo.fi/personnel/ndiaz



On 20.2.2014 22:04, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
> Hi Bernadette,
> Many thanks for your answer.
>
>> Can you be a bit more specific? Are you looking for evaluation criteria?
> Yes, actually I am looking for evaluation criteria. Let’s say two 
> ontologies X and Y are built for the same domain D, without any 
> Competency Questions (CQ). X and Y reused differently terms from other 
> namespaces. If I was asked to run an experiment with users to evaluate 
> (both qualitative and quantitative) those two ontologies , are they 
> already framework to help me in this task?
>
>>  There is of course basic vocabulary considerations aimed at helping 
>> people review a vocabulary to evaluate its usefulness in the Best 
>> Practices document but presumably you're looking for more or 
>> something different?? [1] 
>
> Thanks again for your advices.
>
> Cheers,
> Ghislain
>
>