- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:15:01 +0100
- To: Antonino Lo Bue <lobue@pa.icar.cnr.it>
- Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Hey Antonino, I don't know where you get your information from, but SPIN is the flexible solution, as it gives you the full flexibility of SPARQL and more. Not only for inferencing, but also for constraints, query modelling etc. What are the alternatives you have in mind? The "new thing" coming is probably W3C Data Shapes: http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page It will take some time before it becomes standard however, and hopefully it will be based on SPIN anyway. Martynas graphityhq.com On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Antonino Lo Bue <lobue@pa.icar.cnr.it> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm wondering if someone from the list could make a clear point on SPIN > adoption and usage status. I'm planning to use it in my research work to > model SPARQL inferencing on Open data->Linked open data workflows , but I > have heard that something new is coming and would/could replace SPIN with > a more flexible language. > Is this the case and so I could risk to work with outdated and legacy > stuff? Or do you encourage the adoption? > > Thanks and regards > > Antonino Lo Bue > CNR-ICAR Palermo > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/antoninolobue > > >
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 17:15:28 UTC