- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:58:54 +0000
- To: Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Hi Ed, CC: Mark Baker, I've actually been part of the LDP group; I fully agreed with Mark's concern on the lack of hypermedia controls [1]. LDP is based on a set of agreements, not on a set of dynamic affordances. Would have loved to see a proposal such as this one [2] make it, but it was then clarified that the goal of LDP was to make one API [3]. Best, Ruben [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0007.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0018.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp/2012Nov/0029.html On 20 Nov 2013, at 12:49, Edward Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Ruben, > > I haven’t used it (or really read the spec) but you might be interested in taking a look at the Linked Data Platform 1,2], which provides some patterns for expressing create/update/delete hypermedia controls in RDF. > > I’d be interested to hear what your specific use case is. > > //Ed
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 15:59:28 UTC