W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Final CFP: In-Use Track ISWC 2013

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 08:12:02 +0200
Message-Id: <C2153C78-09C7-40C1-A4EF-9E54152FF9D3@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Hi Sarven

As you know, the community produces the semantic web dogfood site that contains Linked Data about the papers published by the community's conferences and workshops. This refers to that.

I thought my response and Carsten's  addressed your email with respect to LISC. There was also a very long thread appearing afterwards talking about the various aspects to this around publication formats. I think you have to acknowledge that there are disagreements with your position with respect to technology for publication.

I don't know why your pessimistic - we are publishing rdf data about our publications , more authors are providing links to code and data sources, we have open access forums for our papers. Journals like SWJ are experimenting with new forms of peer review.

The linked data community is full of experiments and great stuff to do better science. 

Paul

On May 1, 2013, at 22:35, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

> On 05/01/2013 09:44 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Submissions must be in PDF formatted in the style of the Springer
>> Publications format for Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). For
>> details on the LNCS style, see Springer's Author Instructions
>> (http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-6-793341-0).
>> ISWC-2013 submissions are not anonymous.
>> Authors of accepted papers will be required to provide semantic
>> annotations for the abstract of their submission, which will be made
>> available on the conference web site. Details will be provided at the
>> time of acceptance.
> 
> Hi Paul. Can you please help me understand that better by clarifying?
> 
> Shall I be optimistic in light of recent conversations on this mailing list to welcome Web friendly formats, this might partly come true?
> 
> Or, shall I be pessimistic about the situation, given [1], [2] (no response), it is not going to happen for reasons that the community is not worthy enough to know or able to change?
> 
> What will it take to make an announcement that the event welcomes HTML? What's a show-stopper and can you propose a possibility where we can break-through?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Apr/0297.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Apr/0303.html
> 
> -Sarven
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 06:12:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:44 UTC