- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:16:51 +0000
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5155BE73.1040005@ontotext.com>
The data I mention is available primarily at: http://euclid.sti2.org/musicbrainz-rdf-dump-20130319.tar.gz With a SPARQL endpoint at: http://euclid.sti2.org:9080/repositories/musicbrainz Human-queryable at: http://euclid.sti2.org/Exercises/Exercise2/sparql (Both may be authenticated, for use in study against the curriculum, with the credentials exercise2/exercise2 and are expanding to full mapping over the MusicBrainz NGS, including advanced relationships, as well as mappings to, and annotations of, further data/content) The plans to publish monitoring, based on the EUCLID curriculum topics, is something that we're beginning now. Rest assured that a taxonomy and then the monitoring data will be available by June at the latest. Regards, Barry On 29/03/13 15:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 3/29/13 11:45 AM, Barry Norton wrote: >> >> We are aware the project needs to catch up having produced only 150M >> downloadable triples, with a public SPARQL endpoint, so far... > > We are kind talking past one another. For now, just share the SPARQL > endpoint URL. It just might be enough for me to make why I am seeking > clearer. > > Just drop a URL in response, that's all I need for now :-) > > Kingsley >> >> Barry >> >> >> >> On 29/03/13 15:01, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> On 3/29/13 10:53 AM, Barry Norton wrote: >>>> >>>> You're welcome to read the public project description, in which >>>> there's plenty of provision for dog food. >>>> >>>> I ask because it seemed like you might have some specific idea on >>>> encoding - we wouldn't set out to teach anything if we were so >>>> green as to need the 'just a Turtle file is enough' pep talk. >>> >>> It isn't a pep talk. >>> >>> Just produce a Turtle document, and then revisit my claim :-) >>> >>> Kingsley >>>> >>>> Barry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 29/03/13 14:12, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>>> On 3/29/13 9:59 AM, Barry Norton wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Kingsley, do you have a particular form in mind? >>>>> >>>>> You mean an ontology for product descriptions for the Turtle doc? >>>>> If that's the question, then not specifically, because I am >>>>> actually trying (once again) to get this community to use this as >>>>> a dog-food exercise. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've suggested to Maria a simple SKOS taxonomy reflecting the >>>>>> organisation of tools in the curriculum, tagging DoaP >>>>>> descriptions (retrieved or reconstructed). >>>>> >>>>> That's a good start. The key is that the Turtle doc gets >>>>> published, then my hope is that the community evolves it across >>>>> the TBox, RBox, and ABox dimensions. In the process, we also setup >>>>> context for some RWW Linked Data and the utility of WebID based >>>>> ACLs etc.. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm particularly interested in EUCLID as we're committed to >>>>>> monitoring the discussion on fora such as this, and this would be >>>>>> a great source of both labels and aggregation (there are some >>>>>> tools whose mention is rather seldom - certainly a few have come >>>>>> up that I hadn't heard of). >>>>>> >>>>>> Rather than fixed Turtle I'd provide an endpoint at the project >>>>>> server, together with the monitoring results. >>>>> >>>>> I there's a SPARQL endpoint that can emit Turtle via SPARQL >>>>> Protocol URLs that's fine too since those interested than then >>>>> fork, tweak, and make pull requests etc.. >>>>> >>>>> If this goes to Github, then that's fine too, making Linked Data >>>>> from Github data is already delivered by URIBurner etc. >>>>> >>>>> Examples W3C Groups: >>>>> >>>>> JSON-LD (Github): >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://bit.ly/Zrv1bX -- Overview by Issue Creators (idehen.net >>>>> data space) using Faceted Browsing Interface >>>>> [2] http://bit.ly/10hpLZJ -- Basic Linked Data Description (see >>>>> page footer for alternative description graph representation >>>>> formats). >>>>> >>>>> Linked Data Platform Group (W3C Tracker): >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://bit.ly/Yiun47 -- Overview by Issue Creators (idehen.net >>>>> data space) . >>>>> [2] http://bit.ly/YrAz5L -- Overview by Issue Creators (URIBurner >>>>> data space by changing _hostname_ [_authority_] part of URI to >>>>> "linkeddata.uriburner.com") >>>>> >>>>> WebID Community Group (W3C Tracker): >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://bit.ly/YiyHAq -- Overview by Issue Creator (idehen.net >>>>> data space) . >>>>> [2] http://bit.ly/WfwsKB -- Overview by Issue Creator (URIBurner >>>>> data space by changing _hostname_ [_authority_] part of URI to >>>>> "linkeddata.uriburner.com"). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kingsley >>>>>> >>>>>> Barry >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 29/03/13 13:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/29/13 9:41 AM, Maria Maleshkova wrote: >>>>>>>> Thank you for the feedback! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am currently collecting as many visualisation-tools and have >>>>>>>> to started to classify them a bit, to list the type of >>>>>>>> functionalities that they support and the level of maturity of >>>>>>>> the implementation (prototype vs. product) >>>>>>>> This is why the list in the outline was a bit incomplete. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Naturally, I will post the results here, hoping to get them >>>>>>>> ready quire soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What about publishing a Turtle doc? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 16:17:15 UTC