- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:50:51 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5155B85B.9040304@openlinksw.com>
On 3/29/13 11:45 AM, Barry Norton wrote: > > We are aware the project needs to catch up having produced only 150M > downloadable triples, with a public SPARQL endpoint, so far... We are kind talking past one another. For now, just share the SPARQL endpoint URL. It just might be enough for me to make why I am seeking clearer. Just drop a URL in response, that's all I need for now :-) Kingsley > > Barry > > > > On 29/03/13 15:01, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 3/29/13 10:53 AM, Barry Norton wrote: >>> >>> You're welcome to read the public project description, in which >>> there's plenty of provision for dog food. >>> >>> I ask because it seemed like you might have some specific idea on >>> encoding - we wouldn't set out to teach anything if we were so green >>> as to need the 'just a Turtle file is enough' pep talk. >> >> It isn't a pep talk. >> >> Just produce a Turtle document, and then revisit my claim :-) >> >> Kingsley >>> >>> Barry >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29/03/13 14:12, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>> On 3/29/13 9:59 AM, Barry Norton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Kingsley, do you have a particular form in mind? >>>> >>>> You mean an ontology for product descriptions for the Turtle doc? >>>> If that's the question, then not specifically, because I am >>>> actually trying (once again) to get this community to use this as a >>>> dog-food exercise. >>>>> >>>>> I've suggested to Maria a simple SKOS taxonomy reflecting the >>>>> organisation of tools in the curriculum, tagging DoaP descriptions >>>>> (retrieved or reconstructed). >>>> >>>> That's a good start. The key is that the Turtle doc gets published, >>>> then my hope is that the community evolves it across the TBox, >>>> RBox, and ABox dimensions. In the process, we also setup context >>>> for some RWW Linked Data and the utility of WebID based ACLs etc.. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm particularly interested in EUCLID as we're committed to >>>>> monitoring the discussion on fora such as this, and this would be >>>>> a great source of both labels and aggregation (there are some >>>>> tools whose mention is rather seldom - certainly a few have come >>>>> up that I hadn't heard of). >>>>> >>>>> Rather than fixed Turtle I'd provide an endpoint at the project >>>>> server, together with the monitoring results. >>>> >>>> I there's a SPARQL endpoint that can emit Turtle via SPARQL >>>> Protocol URLs that's fine too since those interested than then >>>> fork, tweak, and make pull requests etc.. >>>> >>>> If this goes to Github, then that's fine too, making Linked Data >>>> from Github data is already delivered by URIBurner etc. >>>> >>>> Examples W3C Groups: >>>> >>>> JSON-LD (Github): >>>> >>>> [1] http://bit.ly/Zrv1bX -- Overview by Issue Creators (idehen.net >>>> data space) using Faceted Browsing Interface >>>> [2] http://bit.ly/10hpLZJ -- Basic Linked Data Description (see >>>> page footer for alternative description graph representation formats). >>>> >>>> Linked Data Platform Group (W3C Tracker): >>>> >>>> [1] http://bit.ly/Yiun47 -- Overview by Issue Creators (idehen.net >>>> data space) . >>>> [2] http://bit.ly/YrAz5L -- Overview by Issue Creators (URIBurner >>>> data space by changing _hostname_ [_authority_] part of URI to >>>> "linkeddata.uriburner.com") >>>> >>>> WebID Community Group (W3C Tracker): >>>> >>>> [1] http://bit.ly/YiyHAq -- Overview by Issue Creator (idehen.net >>>> data space) . >>>> [2] http://bit.ly/WfwsKB -- Overview by Issue Creator (URIBurner >>>> data space by changing _hostname_ [_authority_] part of URI to >>>> "linkeddata.uriburner.com"). >>>> >>>> >>>> Kingsley >>>>> >>>>> Barry >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29/03/13 13:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>>>>> On 3/29/13 9:41 AM, Maria Maleshkova wrote: >>>>>>> Thank you for the feedback! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am currently collecting as many visualisation-tools and have >>>>>>> to started to classify them a bit, to list the type of >>>>>>> functionalities that they support and the level of maturity of >>>>>>> the implementation (prototype vs. product) >>>>>>> This is why the list in the outline was a bit incomplete. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Naturally, I will post the results here, hoping to get them >>>>>>> ready quire soon. >>>>>> >>>>>> What about publishing a Turtle doc? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 15:51:15 UTC