Re: Visualizing Linked Data - did we miss anything?

Kingsley, do you have a particular form in mind?

I've suggested to Maria a simple SKOS taxonomy reflecting the 
organisation of tools in the curriculum, tagging DoaP descriptions 
(retrieved or reconstructed).

I'm particularly interested in EUCLID as we're committed to monitoring 
the discussion on fora such as this, and this would be a great source of 
both labels and aggregation (there are some tools whose mention is 
rather seldom - certainly a few have come up that I hadn't heard of).

Rather than fixed Turtle I'd provide an endpoint at the project server, 
together with the monitoring results.


On 29/03/13 13:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 3/29/13 9:41 AM, Maria Maleshkova wrote:
>> Thank you for the feedback!
>> I am currently collecting as many visualisation-tools and have to 
>> started to classify them a bit,  to list the type of functionalities 
>> that they support and the level of maturity of the implementation 
>> (prototype vs. product)
>> This is why the list in the outline was a bit incomplete.
>> Naturally, I will post the results here, hoping to get them ready 
>> quire soon.
> What about publishing a Turtle doc?

Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 13:59:25 UTC