- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:43:00 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>
Yes. I went to ORCID to see if I could do the linkage to other URIs (and sameAs.org it) but found it wasn't Linked Data so I went away again. It would be nice to think this was a bug, rather than a feature, and that it could be Linked Data. On 12 Mar 2013, at 11:21, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > In my projects, we have been wanting to recommend using ORCID [1] as > part of identifying authors and contributors. ORCID is receiving > increasing attention in the scientific publishing community as it > promises a unified way to identify authors of scientific publications. > > > I was going to include an ex:orcid property on foaf:Agents in our > specifications, perhaps as an owl:sameAs subproperty (I know, I > know!). > > There's no official property for linking to a ORCID profile at the > moment [5] - I would be careful about using foaf:account to the ORCID > URI, as the ORCID identifies the person (at least in a scientific > context), and not an OnlineAccount - has someone else tried a > structure here? > > > > There are other long-standing issues in using ORCID in Linked Data: > > > For one, the URI to use is unclear [2], but the form > <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718> is what is currently being > promoted [3]: > >> The ORCID iD should always be expressed and stored as a URI: http://orcid.org/xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx (with the protocol (http://), and with hyphens in the number xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx). > > (Strangely this advise is not reflected on orcid.org itself) > > > Another issue is that there is actually no RDF exposed from orcid.org [4]. > > > But the last issue is that if you request the ORCID URI with Accept: > application/rdf+xml - then the REST API wrongly returns its own XML > format - but still claims Content-Type application/rdf+xml. The issue > for this [5] has just been postponed 'for several months', even though > it should be a simple fix. > > > This raises the question if ORCIDs would still be relevant on the > semantic web. Does anyone else have views, alternatives or > suggestions? > > > > [1] http://orcid.org/ > [2] http://support.orcid.org/forums/175591-orcid-ideas-forum/suggestions/3641532 > [3] http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/116780-structure-of-the-orcid-identifier > [4] http://support.orcid.org/forums/175591-orcid-ideas-forum/suggestions/3283848 > [5] http://support.orcid.org/forums/175591-orcid-ideas-forum/suggestions/3291844 > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester >
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2013 13:44:17 UTC