- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:02:03 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Barry, First, the obvious: the MusicBrainz core data is in the Public Domain, and you can freely publish its transformation as you like, but the MusicBrainz supplementary data is CC-BY-NC-SA and its transformations must be shared "alike". So, if you have created a dataset, this time in RDF, containing the "user ratings" (supplementary data) in MusicBrainz, you have little choice: CC-BY-NC-SA. Yet DBpedia requires CC-BY-SA, so in theory this downgrade would not be acceptable: you should not include in DBpedia any piece belonging to the "MusicBrainz Supplementary Data". Next, about the granularity level for licensing: individuals of rr:TriplesMap look a perfect target to be attributed and licensed. No individual data -or small pieces, like a single user rating and derived statistics- receive actually any protection by the law, but by publishing many of them the collection would be protected. A single triple pointing to a license ( <myTripleMap> dc:license <license_of_your_choice>) should suffice. Finally, I see the question "triples that are created using it" as very conflictive one. Are those triples transformed versions of the mapping? Víctor El 12/07/2013 14:20, Barry Norton escribió: > > I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz > dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can > be used to create a linkset. > > Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to > the mappings, as opposed to the dataset) > > I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and attribution > on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on github and > contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get through all > of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself and I'm > being a bottleneck.) > > The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in turn > impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as > derivative works)? Does that sound feasible? > > Any input appreciated. > > Barry > -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 17:02:24 UTC