- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:38:45 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Boris, that's really interesting, I wasn't aware. Under mappings, though, I just see directory listings and no version control - if these remain under git(hub) would you poll them? Cheers, Barry On 12/07/13 13:35, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > Hi Barry > > This is not fully related with your question. But, within mappingpedia > initiative [1] we are collecting RDB2RDF mappings. So, your mappings > would be useful for us. > We are developing a vocab for describing the mappings, and we will > include the licence information. > > Boris > > > [1] http://mappingpedia.linkeddata.es/ > > On 12/07/2013 14:20, Barry Norton wrote: >> >> I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz >> dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can >> be used to create a linkset. >> >> Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to >> the mappings, as opposed to the dataset) >> >> I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and >> attribution on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on >> github and contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get >> through all of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself >> and I'm being a bottleneck.) >> >> The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in >> turn impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as >> derivative works)? Does that sound feasible? >> >> Any input appreciated. >> >> Barry >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 12:39:10 UTC