W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Licensing advice

From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:38:45 +0100
Message-ID: <51DFF8D5.3030401@ontotext.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org

Boris, that's really interesting, I wasn't aware.

Under mappings, though, I just see directory listings and no version 
control - if these remain under git(hub) would you poll them?

Cheers,

Barry


On 12/07/13 13:35, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
> Hi Barry
>
> This is not fully related with your question. But, within mappingpedia 
> initiative [1]  we are collecting RDB2RDF mappings. So, your mappings 
> would be useful for us.
> We are developing a vocab for describing the mappings, and we will 
> include the licence information.
>
> Boris
>
>
> [1] http://mappingpedia.linkeddata.es/
>
> On 12/07/2013 14:20, Barry Norton wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz 
>> dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can 
>> be used to create a linkset.
>>
>> Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to 
>> the mappings, as opposed to the dataset)
>>
>> I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and 
>> attribution on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on 
>> github and contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get 
>> through all of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself 
>> and I'm being a bottleneck.)
>>
>> The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in 
>> turn impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as 
>> derivative works)? Does that sound feasible?
>>
>> Any input appreciated.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 12:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:52 UTC