W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Licensing advice

From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@isoco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:35:54 +0200
Message-ID: <51DFF82A.4000506@isoco.com>
To: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Barry

This is not fully related with your question. But, within mappingpedia 
initiative [1]  we are collecting RDB2RDF mappings. So, your mappings 
would be useful for us.
We are developing a vocab for describing the mappings, and we will 
include the licence information.

Boris


[1] http://mappingpedia.linkeddata.es/

On 12/07/2013 14:20, Barry Norton wrote:
>
> I'd like to publicly release R2RML mappings for the MusicBrainz 
> dataset. DBpedia has shown interest in including the subset that can 
> be used to create a linkset.
>
> Any idea what (kind of) licence could/should apply? (To be clear, to 
> the mappings, as opposed to the dataset)
>
> I'd also like to attach, since R2RML is RDF, a licence and attribution 
> on a per rr:TriplesMap basis. (The mappings are hosted on github and 
> contributions will be accepted as I'm never going to get through all 
> of the MB Advanced Relationships, a moving target, myself and I'm 
> being a bottleneck.)
>
> The question's also been raised on whether a given licence can in turn 
> impose conditions on the triples that are created using it (as 
> derivative works)? Does that sound feasible?
>
> Any input appreciated.
>
> Barry
>
>
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 12:36:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:52 UTC