- From: Roberto García <rogargon@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 23:44:12 +0100
- To: Damian Steer <d.steer@bris.ac.uk>
- Cc: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Dear all, >> The most reasonable >> thing to do seems to introduce some sort of proxy object, on top of >> which statements can be made. > > I prefer this. It feels FRBR-ish [2][3] although that's not quite right. (Are the individual videos items, and the proxy object a manifestation?) I completely agree with this approach. Indeed, I'll not call it a proxy object, it is a separate entity to be taken into account if we follow back the copyright value chain of the individual video files. I would recommend something like FRBR or the Copyright Ontology Creation Model (http://rhizomik.net/html/~roberto/thesis/html/Conceptualisation.html#CreationModel). By the way, the Creation Model is compared to FRBR and other approaches in: http://rhizomik.net/html/~roberto/papers/rg-jis09.pdf Best, Roberto García http://rhizomik.net/~roberto/
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 22:45:22 UTC