- From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bris.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:49:50 +0000
- To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 5 Dec 2013, at 13:52, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote: > Dear Public-LOD, > > Thank you all for your very helpful replies. Following your joint > arguments, owl:sameAs is _not_ an option then. You could use dc:hasFormat to link them: "A related resource that is substantially the same as the pre-existing described resource, but in another format." [1] <http://ex.org/video.mp4> dc:hasFormat <http://ex.org/video.ogv> . <snip> > The most reasonable > thing to do seems to introduce some sort of proxy object, on top of > which statements can be made. I prefer this. It feels FRBR-ish [2][3] although that's not quite right. (Are the individual videos items, and the proxy object a manifestation?) Damian [1] <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-hasFormat> [2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records> [3] <http://vocab.org/frbr/core.html>
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 14:50:20 UTC