- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:00:57 +0000
- To: public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <529C6869.4040505@light.demon.co.uk>
Hi, I'm sure this has been discussed many times and/or ages ago, but I am struck by the absence of a DOM-like W3C framework for RDF. By this, I mean "an application programming interface (API) for [RDF graphs]", which will be "a standard programming interface that can be used in a wide variety of environments and applications. The [RDF] DOM is designed to be used with any programming language". (Quotes taken from [1]) A quick search turns up a number of PHP-based libraries, and the odd one for javascript, Delphi, Python and Ruby, but as far as I can see there is little, or no, commonality of approach or functionality amongst these offerings. This means that a programmer (a) has to decide which of these widely varying approaches to adopt, (b) only gets whatever documentation each chooses to provide and (c) is faced with a complete rewrite, should they decide to switch RDF platform. Might this situation be a significant factor in the slow take-up of RDF by mainstream developers? Richard [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/introduction.html -- *Richard Light*
Received on Monday, 2 December 2013 11:01:02 UTC