- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 13:23:13 -0400
- To: mca <mca@amundsen.com>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org Data" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52067701.6000408@openlinksw.com>
On 8/10/13 1:20 PM, mca wrote: > IMO, yes, you SHOULD do this as a way to document practice rather than > drive adoption. (standards follow, they don't lead). +1 > > you can do much of the "debate" in the IETF link rel list itself, if > that's important to you. > > and yes, you'll need some implementations to show that this is a good > idea. i suspect you have that now, right? at any rate, posting a > public effort to register can flush new ideas, competing > adoption/implementations and help create consensus. +1 Kingsley > > > > mca > +1.859.757.1449 > skype: mca.amundsen > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > http://twitter.com/mamund > https://github.com/mamund > http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeamundsen > > > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net > <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote: > > > On 10 Aug 2013, at 18:14, mca <mca@amundsen.com > <mailto:mca@amundsen.com>> wrote: > >> Now is the time to register a link relation value with the IANA. >> >> It takes limited effort, need not slow your momentum and will >> make it easier to lead future development in this space. >> > yes, though I think we should have a number of people together > first to back > the proposed link relation. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.3 > > My guess is that we would have better chance of success if we can > show a mailing > list where the issue was debated, a spec that describes the link > relation and > implementation that use it. > > > >> On Aug 10, 2013 12:07 PM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net >> <mailto:henry.story@bblfish.net>> wrote: >> >> >> On 10 Aug 2013, at 17:50, Kingsley Idehen >> <kidehen@openlinksw.com <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote: >> >> > On 8/9/13 8:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> The protected resource will show you where the acl (meta) >> data is with the header rel="meta" >> > I thought the consensus was: rel="acl" >> > >> > I guess, we are just going to have to support both, to be >> safe . >> >> There are still very few implementations, so this is the >> point where consensus can >> be reached at little cost. >> >> I don't think that this problem was discussed yet in a forum >> where the implementers >> were present. >> >> Henry >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Kingsley Idehen >> > Founder & CEO >> > OpenLink Software >> > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> <http://www.openlinksw.com/> >> > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen> >> > Twitter/Identi.ca <http://Identi.ca> handle: @kidehen >> > Google+ Profile: >> https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about >> > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 17:23:38 UTC