- From: Bo Ferri <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:33:38 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Hi all, generally, it is really interesting to follow this discussion. I've never been a friend of the cumbersome scientific research publishing way (that's why there are no real scientific publications available from myself - except the two theses that I wrote during my studies ;) ). So I'm really looking forward to a more webby for doing this since ages. When I wrote my final thesis in 2010/11 - I tried to publish as many content (section excerpts, slides, ontologies, code, ... e.g. [3, 4, 5]) on the web from my theses as I could. For a starting point Wordpress and Drupal are your friends (as Ivan already suggested). With semantic annotation plugins รก la RDFaCE [1] one could go even a step further. Other plugins such as Angelo's Wordpress extension [2] can deliver the metadata. However, finally I wrote the thesis itself in LaTeX and published (also on the Web, e.g., Mendeley or ResearchGate) as PDF, because I never found a good LaTeX to HTML converter that could handle my latex document in a satisfiable way. Fortunately, Authorea is exactly trying to do this for me. So I'll give it try with my theses (with so many web references inside ;) ) and let you know whether it is really able to handle a "real world" LaTeX document. At the end tools such as Authorea are the perfect bridge for the way we are trying to go now by bringing scientific research publishing to the present. Cheers, Bo [1] http://rdface.aksw.org/ [2] https://github.com/angelo-v/wp-linked-data [3] http://smiy.org [4] http://purl.org/smiy/ [5] http://zazi.smiy.org/slides/pmkb-defence/pmkb.html On 4/25/2013 8:21 AM, Herbert Van de Sompel wrote: > > There is evolution in this realm too, see e.g. https://www.authorea.com/ > > Greetings > > Herbert
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2013 12:34:13 UTC