Re: Content negotiation negotiation

On 4/23/13 5:04 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Ah POWDER - of course.
> It all comes together :-)
> (Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
> So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
> Any proposal to attach types to the objects of the wdrs:desribedby triples?

So as in 
<http://ns.nature.com/docs/terms/datatypes/anyURI___279277607.html> you 
seek the xsd:anyURI type qualification, for objects of said relation, 
right? If yes, then fine, it can be added quickly.
> Any proposal so that I can infer the available types for the whole dataset, rather than inferring from a particular resource resolution?

You mean for RDF resources such as the one denoted by 
<http://dbpedia.org/data/Luton.ttl> ? If yes, then we can just add the 
missing resource metadata relations which would basically come from VoID 
[1].

Links:

1. http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#class-property-partitions

Kingsley
> Cheers
>
> On 23 Apr 2013, at 21:48, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/23/13 4:23 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>> Ah, thanks for the Web101 course.:-)
>>> Sorry, I usually live in a Linked Data world, so I don't think about html stuff such as
>>> <link rel="alternate" …
>>> because (like the header) it doesn't appear in the RDF.
>>>
>>> On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:54, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On 4/23/13 3:39 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>>>>>> Ah of course - thanks Mark, silly me.
>>>>>>> So I look at the Link: header for something like
>>>>>>> curl -L -ihttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton
>>>>>>> Which gives me the information I want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone got any offers for how I would use Linked Data to get this into my RDF store?
>>>>> Assuming I understand your question, the answer would depend on the capabilities of your RDF store. If it can injest RDF resource URLs you can request the formats exposed on the "Link:" responses.  If it handles SPARQL 1.1 INSERT and/or LOAD just use SPARQL.
>>> I don't think I can use the SPARQL INSERT, etc, because it isn't RDF.
>>> Is the <link rel="alternate" available anywhere as RDF?
>>> It could be returned with the RDF forhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton  Better still, it could be available in the voiD description (so that it is site-oriented, not resource-oriented)?
>>> Or somewhere else?
>>> Cheers
>> Okay, now that <link/>, "Link:", and SPARQL aren't options, of course you can get it from the RDF that describes <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton>, see:
>> http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLuton&gp=8&go=
>>
>> We use the wdrs:desribedby relation for that :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen	
>> Founder & CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen