- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:10:05 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <516DBE2D.6000709@openlinksw.com>
On 4/16/13 4:27 PM, Aidan Hogan wrote: > In summary: > > * "SPARQL scales in some cases" = vague, but okay > * "SPARQL scales" = not okay Does SQL scale? In short, does any query language scale in this context? How does some RESTful pattern scale in a manner that surpasses what's possible with a declarative query language? My original context for scale was a single interaction pattern over HTTP that's endowed with a declarative query language. SPARQL Protocol patterns are more scalable than REST interaction patterns since you have one vs a N number of different RESTful patterns. That said, I am eternally interested in useful SPARQL queries that make a useful case for SPARQL not being scalable when the goal is a useful solution. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 21:10:28 UTC