Re: uri for uri

On 1 Apr 2013, at 15:32, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com> wrote:
> In which case we can probably get rid of the ':' too?

And the domain name too? Everything good is on facebook.com anyways.

Richard


> 
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That would save a LOT of typing. I haven't used ftp:// in years, maybe we
>> could just go for : and assume it's HTTP?
>> 
>> Barry
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 01/04/2013 14:57, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 1 Apr 2013, at 14:38, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Well, the colon should be.  No reason why the / should be in this case.
>>>> You can't have more than one colon in a URI.
>>>> (Though you can in what's typed in a browser bar).
>>>> 
>>>> Also, the TAG is going to eliminate the // soon, which will make
>>>> everything much simpler.
>>> 
>>> That's great news Tim!
>>> After all these years.
>>> The savings in time and bandwidth will be enormous.
>>> Couldn't they also drop the "tp"?
>>> Well, it has to be a Transfer Protocol after all.
>>> And any sensible Unix user knows you only need 2 letters to identify
>>> things.
>>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>> (hmmm ...So what would be the %-encoded version of
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net
>>>> 
>>>> ?)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://uri4uri.net/uri/http%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net%2Furi.html%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Furi4uri.net
>>> 
>>> Since you ask.
>>> Which is 1568 chars.
>>> Hugh
>>> 
>>>> Tim
>>>> 
>>>> On 2013-04 -01, at 09:14, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Shouldn't the path component of the URIs be percent-encoded? That is,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://uri4uri.net/uri/%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCopenhagen
>>>>> 
>>>>> instead of
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://uri4uri.net/uri/http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copenhagen
>>>>> 
>>>>> Martynas
>>>>> graphity.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Gutteridge
>>>>> <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of
>>>>>> reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> related resources together, not the identifiers for those resources.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what authority
>>>>>> assigned
>>>>>> the URI and when.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello Chris,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this
>>>>>>> proposal,
>>>>>>> LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Michael Brunnbauer
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves
>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>> of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising..
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service:
>>>>>>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>>>>>>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog:
>>>>>>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service:
>>>>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/
>>>>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog:
>>>>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/
> 

Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 15:11:15 UTC