- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:29:50 +0100
- To: Pablo Mendes <pablomendes@gmail.com>
- CC: Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
And Dublin Core has dcterms:relation [1] Label: A related resource Comment: Recommended best practice is to identify the related resource by means of a string conforming to a formal identification system. Note: This term is intended to be used with non-literal values as defined in the DCMI Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration. Which is about as close as this venerable technology-neutral body can come to saying "it's designed to point from one RDF resource to another that is in some way related ;-) " http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-relation On 13/05/2012 15:12, Pablo Mendes wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > I am doing a similar thing for DBpedia Spotlight [1], and was thinking > about using skos:related > > "The property skos:related is used to assert an associative link between > two SKOS concepts." > "skos:related is not defined as a transitive property." > > The only problem might be: > Domain: skos:Concept > Range: skos:Concept > > http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ > > Cheers, > Pablo > [1] https://github.com/pablomendes/dbpedia-spotlight-gsoc > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Nicholas Humfrey< > nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm not sure rdfs:seeAlso is quite right: >> "rdfs:seeAlso ... is used to indicate a resource that might provide >> additional information about the subject resource." >> >> While the definition is quite vague (using the word 'might'), the links >> will >> almost certainly not describe the same subject. >> >> nick. >> >> >> On 12/05/2012 14:57, "Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche" >> <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello Nicholas, >>> >>> why not using rdfs:seeAlso ? >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_seealso >>> This property is designed for your need. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nicholas Humfrey< >> nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk> >>> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am looking at making some enhancements to dbpedialite.org >>>> <http://dbpedialite.org> . >>>> >>>> One of the things I plan to add is a list of things linked to from a >>>> Wikipedia article. This could be useful for machine learning. >>>> >>>> For example for London: >>>> Metropolitan area >>>> River Thames >>>> History of London >>>> Roman Empire >>>> City of London >>>> City Hall >>>> ... >>>> >>>> 'similar to' or 'related to' are too strong. There may be links on the >> page >>>> to say that one thing is definitely not related to another. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any suggestions on the predicate that I should use? >> Should >>>> I just make one up? Should I create it in OpenVocab? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> nick. >>>> >>>> >> >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal >> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. >> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in >> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. >> Further communication will signify your consent to this. >> >> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 20:30:23 UTC