Re: Predicate for 'related' things based on Wikipedia links?

Hi Nicholas,
I am doing a similar thing for DBpedia Spotlight [1], and was thinking
about using skos:related

"The property skos:related is used to assert an associative link between
two SKOS concepts."
"skos:related is not defined as a transitive property."

The only problem might be:
Domain: skos:Concept
Range: skos:Concept

http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/

Cheers,
Pablo
[1]  https://github.com/pablomendes/dbpedia-spotlight-gsoc


On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Nicholas Humfrey <
nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure rdfs:seeAlso is quite right:
> "rdfs:seeAlso ... is used to indicate a resource that might provide
> additional information about the subject resource."
>
> While the definition is quite vague (using the word 'might'), the links
> will
> almost certainly not describe the same subject.
>
> nick.
>
>
> On 12/05/2012 14:57, "Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche"
> <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Nicholas,
> >
> > why not using rdfs:seeAlso ?
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_seealso
> > This property is designed for your need.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Nicholas Humfrey <
> nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am looking at making some enhancements to dbpedialite.org
> >> <http://dbpedialite.org> .
> >>
> >> One of the things I plan to add is a list of things linked to from a
> >> Wikipedia article. This could be useful for machine learning.
> >>
> >> For example for London:
> >> Metropolitan area
> >> River Thames
> >> History of London
> >> Roman Empire
> >> City of London
> >> City Hall
> >> ...
> >>
> >> 'similar to' or 'related to' are too strong. There may be links on the
> page
> >> to say that one thing is definitely not related to another.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any suggestions on the predicate that I should use?
> Should
> >> I just make one up? Should I create it in OpenVocab?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> nick.
> >>
> >>
>
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>
>
>