Re: NIR SIDETRACK Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

Hallo Norman,

> -Regardless of how you define IR, everything that denotes what it accesses
>  should lie in IR.
> 
> -Putting something in NIR therefor also answers the question if it denotes
>  what it accesses with "no" by entailment.

I have worded this very badly. We are talking about things and names of things.
This should be:

For all URIs U: denote(U) = access(U) -> denote(U) a IR

It follows: For all URIs U: denote(U) not a IR -> denote(U) != access(U)

> -There may or may not be IRs that do not denote what they access.

And this should be:

There is a URI U where: denote(U) a IR and denote(U) != access(U).

Now if a am allowed to mint a URI that 303's to your homepage and your
homepage is an IR, such an URI must exist:

U1 = Your URI for your homepage
U2 = My URI for your homepage
denote(U1) a IR
denote(U2) != access(U2)
denote(U1) = denote(U2) thererfor denote(U2) a IR and denote(U2) != access(U2)

I think I'll stay out of this discussion from now :-)

Regards,

Michael Brunnbauer


-- 
++  Michael Brunnbauer
++  netEstate GmbH
++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
++  81379 München
++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
++  E-Mail brunni@netestate.de
++  http://www.netestate.de/
++
++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 21:35:30 UTC