Re: What would break? Re: httpRange-14

On 3/26/12 3:16 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
> Hi all:
>
>> My example about rdfs:isDefinedBy remains, a majority of ontologies constructed by folks who grok the fundamentals still don't include rdfs:isDefinedBy relations. Thus, I've resorted to fixing those ontologies when ingested instead of pinging the ontology authors. The same thing applies (even more) to wdrs:describedby which ended getting fixed in response to my "tale of two missing predicates" post [1] around the time of the Toucan post etc..
>>
> FYI:
>
> http://www.productontology.org implements both rdfs:isDefinedBy and wdrs:describedby, I hope correctly.
>
> See
>
> http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer (with conneg)
> http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl
> http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf
>
>
>
> In fact, www.productontology.org tries to model all distinct conceptual entities and their relationships in a very granular way, see:
>
>
> <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf>  a foaf:Document;
> 	foaf:primaryTopic<http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
> <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl>  a foaf:Document;
> 	foaf:primaryTopic<http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
> <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer>  a foaf:Document;
> 	foaf:primaryTopic<http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
> 	
> <http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>  a owl:Class;
> 	rdfs:isDefinedBy<http://www.productontology.org/#>;
> ...
> 	wdrs:describedby<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf>,<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl>;
> 	foaf:homepage<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.html>;
> 	foaf:page<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammer>.
>
> GoodRelations, the Vehicle Sales Ontology, the Tickets Ontology, the Volkswagen Car Options Ontology, and the Volkswagen Vehicles Ontology all contain at least rdfs:isDefinedBy axioms.
>
> http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
> http://purl.org/vso/ns
> http://purl.org/tio/ns
> http://purl.org/coo/ns
> http://purl.org/vvo/ns
>
> But I think you can hardly get this correct without
>
> 1. reading RFC 2616 over and over again and
> 2. having the privilege of getting feedback from Kingsley.
>
> ;-)
>
> Martin
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> martin hepp
> e-business&  web science research group
> universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
> e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
> phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
> fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
> www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>           http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
> skype:   mfhepp
> twitter: mfhepp
>
> Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
> =================================================================
> * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>
>
>
>
>
Martin,

Awesome!

See: 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer 
.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen