- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:16:39 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Hi all:
> My example about rdfs:isDefinedBy remains, a majority of ontologies constructed by folks who grok the fundamentals still don't include rdfs:isDefinedBy relations. Thus, I've resorted to fixing those ontologies when ingested instead of pinging the ontology authors. The same thing applies (even more) to wdrs:describedby which ended getting fixed in response to my "tale of two missing predicates" post [1] around the time of the Toucan post etc..
>
FYI:
http://www.productontology.org implements both rdfs:isDefinedBy and wdrs:describedby, I hope correctly.
See
http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer (with conneg)
http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl
http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf
In fact, www.productontology.org tries to model all distinct conceptual entities and their relationships in a very granular way, see:
<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf> a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic <http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl> a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic <http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
<http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer> a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic <http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer>.
<http://www.productontology.org/id/Hammer> a owl:Class;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.productontology.org/#>;
...
wdrs:describedby <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.rdf>, <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.ttl>;
foaf:homepage <http://www.productontology.org/doc/Hammer.html>;
foaf:page <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammer>.
GoodRelations, the Vehicle Sales Ontology, the Tickets Ontology, the Volkswagen Car Options Ontology, and the Volkswagen Vehicles Ontology all contain at least rdfs:isDefinedBy axioms.
http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1
http://purl.org/vso/ns
http://purl.org/tio/ns
http://purl.org/coo/ns
http://purl.org/vvo/ns
But I think you can hardly get this correct without
1. reading RFC 2616 over and over again and
2. having the privilege of getting feedback from Kingsley.
;-)
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 19:17:05 UTC