- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:03:18 +0100
- To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 25 March 2012 11:03, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de> wrote: > > Hello Jeni, > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:13:09AM +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote: >> I agree we shouldn't blame publishers who conflate IRs and NIRs. That is not what happens at the moment. Therefore we need to change something. > > Do you think semantic web projects have been stopped because some purist > involved did not see a way to bring httprange14 into agreement with the > other intricacies of the project ? Those purists will still see the new > options that the proposal offers as what they are: Suboptimal. > > Or do you think some purists have been actually blaming publishers ? [...] http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/new-york-times-blunders-into-linked.html comes close to doing so... though more around semantics of 'sameas' than IR/NIR. Dan
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 18:03:47 UTC