- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:46:47 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F6F3DE7.1050802@openlinksw.com>
On 3/25/12 5:13 AM, Jeni Tennison wrote: > I agree we shouldn't blame publishers who conflate IRs and NIRs. That is not what happens at the moment. Therefore we need to change something. They only get blamed when they claim that they are publishing Linked Data. If they don't do that nobody will complain. All Structured Data isn't Linked Data. All Linked Data is a form Structured Data. HttpRange-14 findings facilitate the co-existence of Structured Data and Linked Data on the Web. RDF and its family of syntaxes and serialization formats are vehicles for constructing resources that bear structured data. The same applies to HTML, XML, JSON etc.. None of these syntaxes produce Linked Data implicitly, you have to adhere to Linked Data principles for that to happen. The fundamental concern I have right now is that this effort is conflating basic Structured Data and the fidelity of Linked Data. You don't need any kind of revision to HttpRange-14 recommendations to enable what has long been reality on the Web. By that I mean: people have conflated Names and Addresses via URIs forever. Said conflation is only an issue when the end product is inaccurately classified as being Linked Data principles compliant. Linked Data is a different system or dimension of the Web. Without its fidelity many critical items become impossible to implement at Web scale: 1. data access by Name reference; 2. equivalence fidelity and inference; 3. distributed verifiable identity; 4. functional read-write-web . Conflate Names and Addresses and the above simply fail. Structured Data is growing exponentially on the Web thanks to efforts such as schema.org, Facebook Open Graph, and the emergence of JSON as an alternative to XML re., structured data representation syntax. That's a good thing. The more Structured Data we have on the Web the easier it becomes to explain and demonstrate the unique fidelity and benefits that Linked Data introduces. To conclude, we need to change our tendency to conflate matters since all Structured Data != Linked Data. Every time we conflate everything gets mucked up and things stall. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 15:47:13 UTC