- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:45:14 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>, Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>, Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>, Dave Reynolds <dave@epimorphics.com>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>: > > > 2012/3/23 Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org> >> >> 2012/3/23 Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>: >> > Do you really think that base your proposal on the usage on a Powder >> > annotation is a good idea? >> > >> > Sorry, but IMHO HttpRange-14 is a good enough agreement. >> >> yup performed brilliantly so far, nothing to say. Industry is flocking >> to adoption, and what a consensus. > > > +1 > > 'Brilliantly' is an understatement :) > > And we're probably still only towards the beginning of the adoption cycle! > > I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of > the current architecture (both pre and post HR14). Oh dear, so now I don't know any more if Gio was being saracastic! Linked Data is a brilliant success, despite the burden of http-range-14. Is a SKOS Concept an Information Resource? Must its URIs 303 redirect? Is a # pointing into an RDFa page OK? We don't make this stuff easy. http-range-14 has long been an embarrassment. Just now all the critics get invited to try to do a better job, which isn't as easy as it looks :) Dan
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 09:45:43 UTC