- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:15:35 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 19:16:04 UTC
Nice for /us/ to reason the relatedness of these properties (and to the standard ones we were already using - rdfs:label, rdfs:comment, foaf:depiction, etc.), but those who saw fit to make things 'easier' are stuck with the proliferation... Barry On 20/06/2012 19:52, Aidan Hogan wrote: > On 20/06/2012 18:58, Barry Norton wrote: >> Does the fact that Web users now need to mark up their pages with >> *og:description*, *schema:description* /and/ *twitter:description* not >> make anyone in those communities think that maybe /this/ one had a point >> in the first place? >> >> And that maybe this proliferation is actually /harder /to manage than >> dealing with (shock horror) multiple namespaces? > > Did someone say reasoning?! > > Cheers, > Aidan > > P.S., > http://vimeo.com/28667500 > http://vimeo.com/28667555 >
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 19:16:04 UTC