- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:26:32 +0200
- To: <public-lod@w3.org>
On 5/31/12 4:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote: >> You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have >> it now but one could introduce a special state of "archived" which >> would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as >> archived. > > +1 to a new state for this. Maybe call it “discontinued” or “decommissioned” instead of “archived”? Seems to be more accurate. > +1 for "decommissioned". And apparently it is a word that attracts more attention than my vague "moving" in the previous thread ;-) @Rufus, would you also recommend a prefered entry on CKAN to indicate the "newer" dataset (e.g. for linking [1] to [2])? Antoine [1] http://thedatahub.org/dataset/stitch-rameau [2] http://thedatahub.org/dataset/data-bnf-fr
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 06:27:03 UTC