W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Decommissioning a linked data site

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4FC86098.6010105@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-lod@w3.org>
On 5/31/12 4:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote:
>> You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have
>> it now but one could introduce a special state of "archived" which
>> would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as
>> archived.
> +1 to a new state for this. Maybe call it “discontinued” or “decommissioned” instead of “archived”? Seems to be more accurate.

+1 for "decommissioned". And apparently it is a word that attracts more attention than my vague "moving" in the previous thread ;-)

@Rufus, would you also recommend a prefered entry on CKAN to indicate the "newer" dataset (e.g. for linking [1] to [2])?


[1] http://thedatahub.org/dataset/stitch-rameau
[2] http://thedatahub.org/dataset/data-bnf-fr
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 06:27:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:25 UTC