- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:05:53 -0800 (PST)
- To: Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Cc: Anne Thessen <athessen@mbl.edu>
- Message-ID: <1326917153.21244.YahooMailNeo@web112605.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Hi Pete, I'd use Dublin Core and RDFa in HTML for the Content Partners, but I'd suggest you look into the eGov IG activity on data base licenses. You have, I think, concerns there too. I don't mean to be flippant, but say Dr. Frankenstein is a Content Partner, then the lawyers will want to know if he/she is the FAMOUS Dr. Frankenstein or some pretender. Genus lex is a bit unpredictable, they seem so friendly until they start chasing you :o) --Gannon ________________________________ From: Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com> To: public-lod@w3.org Cc: Anne Thessen <athessen@mbl.edu> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:02 PM Subject: Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners Hi All, If you were to recommend how to markup the content providers listed on this page how would you do it? http://eol.org/content_partners Would you use SIOC, DOAP or some other vocabulary? What some would like is the ability to cite a content partner using just a URI. For example: <dcterms:source rdf:resource="ContentPartnerURI"/> I would appreciate any suggestion or comments :-) Thanks, - Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pete DeVries Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin - Madison 445 Russell Laboratories 1630 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 Email: pdevries@wisc.edu TaxonConcept & GeoSpecies Knowledge Bases A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data Project --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 20:06:31 UTC