Re: Recommendations for Documenting EoL.org Content Partners

Hi Peter

What about something like :

<http://dbpedia.org/resource/EOL> rdf:type <
http://www.w3.org/ns/org#OrganizationalCollaboration>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/EOL> <http://www.w3.org/ns/org#hasMember> <
http://eol.org/partner/159>
<http://eol.org/content/159>  foaf:page <http://eol.org/content_partners/159
>

Bernard

2012/1/18 Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>

> Hi All,
>
> If you were to recommend how to markup the content providers listed on
> this page how would you do it?
>
> http://eol.org/content_partners
>
> Would you use SIOC, DOAP or some other vocabulary?
>
> What some would like is the ability to cite a content partner using just a
> URI.
>
> For example:
>
> <dcterms:source rdf:resource="ContentPartnerURI"/>
>
> I would appreciate any suggestion or comments :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Pete
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pete DeVries
> Department of Entomology
> University of Wisconsin - Madison
> 445 Russell Laboratories
> 1630 Linden Drive
> Madison, WI 53706
> Email: pdevries@wisc.edu
> TaxonConcept <http://www.taxonconcept.org/>  &  GeoSpecies<http://about.geospecies.org/> Knowledge
> Bases
> A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data <http://linkeddata.org/>  Project
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
*Bernard Vatant
*
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
 Skype : bernard.vatant
Linked Open Vocabularies <http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov>

--------------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca**          **                   *
3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
www.mondeca.com
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>