- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:11:52 +0100
- To: Markus Krötzsch <markus.kroetzsch@cs.ox.ac.uk>, Yury Katkov <katkov.juriy@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic MediaWiki users <semediawiki-user@lists.sourceforge.net>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Dear Markus and Yury, I think you make a very important point. Actually STI International could provide (modest) financial and personal support on helping on the issue. If this is viewed as a good proposal we could follow up on this. Many greetings, Dieter At 06:43 PM 1/12/2012, Markus Krötzsch wrote: >Hi Yuri, > >let us take this to one mailing list >semantic-web@w3.org, as this is the list that is >most involved (please drop the others when you reply). > >As the technical maintainer of the site, I >largely agree with your assessment. In spite of >the very high visibility of the site (and >perceived authority), the active editing >community is not big. This is a problem >especially given the significant and continued >spam attacks that the site is under due to its >high visibility (I just recently changed the >captcha system and rolled back thousands of >edits, yet it seems they are already breaking >through again, though in smaller numbers). > >I do not want to blame anybody for the state of >affairs: most of us do not have the time to >contribute significant content to such sites. >However, given the extraordinary visibility of >the site, we should all perceive this as a major >problem (to the extent that we attach our work >to the label "semantic web" in any way). > >So what can be done? > >(1) Freeze the wiki. A weaker version of this >is: allow users only to edit after they were >manually added to a group of trusted users (all >humans welcome). This would require somebody to >manage these permissions but would allow >existing projects/communities to continue to use the site. > >(2) Re-enforce spam protection on the wiki. >Maybe this could be done, but the site is >targeted pretty heavily. Standard captchas like >ReCaptcha are thus getting broken (spammers do >have an effective infrastructure for this), but >maybe non-standard captchas could work better. >This is a task for the technical maintainers >(i.e., me and the folks at AIFB Karlsruhe where the site is hosted). > >(3) Clean the wiki. Whether frozen or not, there >is a lot of spam already. Something needs to be >done to get rid of it. This requires (easy but >tedious) manual effort. Some stakeholders need >to be found to provide basic workforce (e.g., by >hiring a student to help with spam deletion). > >(4) Restore the wiki. Update the main pages >(about technologies and active projects) to >reflect a current and/or timeless state that we >would like new readers to see. This again needs >somebody to push it, and for writing pages about >topics like SPARQL one would need some >expertise. This is a challenge for the community. > >I am willing to invest /some/ time here to help >with the above, but (3) and (4) requires support >from more people. On the other hand, there are >probably hardly more than 20 or 30 *essential* >content pages that we are talking about here, >plus many pages about projects and people that >one should ask the stakeholders to review. So >one might be able to make this into a shining >entry point to the semantic web in a week of >work ... together with (1) and (2) above, the >invested work would remain valuable for a long time. > >Cheers > >Markus > > > >On 12/01/12 10:43, Yury Katkov wrote: >>Hi everyone! >> >>What is the current status of the semanticweb.org >><http://semanticweb.org> website? It used to be the main wiki about the >>semantic web, it has a lot of cool and useful information about >>everything. But now it seems abandoned. I mean, there are about 30 real >>writers who update the information about their projects an write >>articles, but they do something like 30% of changes. The other 70% is spam! >> >>Are there guys who support the website? >>Who manages the community, are there any plans of creating projects and >>articles about SW? Is there community at all? >> >>In my opinion if this great website suppose to be alive the first goal >>is to find volunteers who'll help administrator to combat spam (with >>bots, extensions and editing policies) and support the new activities >>and projets on the wiki. (I'm ready to be one of them). >>If this wiki lived only in the past when it was a big hype around >>Semantic Web topics and now without a big funding nobody wants to use it >>- wouldn't it better to be frozen? >> >>I appreciate and admire people who started up the wiki. Please, don't >>let it be the rotting memorial to the past of the Semantic Web. >>----- >>Sincerely yours, >>Yury Katkov, WikiVote llc >> > > >-- >Dr. Markus Kroetzsch >Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford >Room 306, Parks Road, OX1 3QD Oxford, United Kingdom >+44 (0)1865 283529 http://korrekt.org/ > -- Dieter Fensel Director STI Innsbruck, University of Innsbruck, Austria http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ phone: +43-512-507-6488/5, fax: +43-512-507-9872
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 23:12:01 UTC