- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:18:14 -0500
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFKQJ8n-=MJEP82e_wtpgZWX0PBQmW1Y9MbOTPq8Eh7N1K_0YA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Kinglsey, We don't do content negotiation. I've written concerning why, in the past, to some of the W3C groups. I don't like the practice because it muddies up what exactly the URI means. So we use a not uncommon technique of responding to requests uniformly, with RDF/XML, and providing a stylesheet for rendering in the browser. As far as I know this is consistent with the aims of LOD. The underlying information is in RDF but if you put a URL into your browser you get back human readable information. Is the issue here that some computer wants human readable information? In my prototypes I had a foaf:page link to html. I will ask that this be added to Ontobee and the computers can use that. -Alan On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote: > On 2/23/12 1:32 PM, Peter DeVries wrote: > >> However, I think testing using the Vapour Validator is easier to >> understand. >> >> This might best be shown in comparison to a LOD OWL class that works >> correctly, >> >> OBO Ontology URI http://purl.org/obo/owl/HAO#**HAO_0000000<http://purl.org/obo/owl/HAO#HAO_0000000> >> >> Mapped URI http://purl.obolibrary.org/**obo/HAO_0000000<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HAO_0000000> >> >> HTML Page http://api.hymao.org/public/**ontology_class/show_expanded/** >> 4048 <http://api.hymao.org/public/ontology_class/show_expanded/4048> >> >> Check in the Vapour Validator http://validator.linkeddata.**org/vapour<http://validator.linkeddata.org/vapour> >> >> For comparison >> >> URI for the Species Apis mellifera http://lod.taxonconcept.org/** >> ses/z9oqP#Species <http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/z9oqP#Species> >> >> Human Page http://lod.taxonconcept.org/**ses/z9oqP.html<http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/z9oqP.html> >> >> Check the URI using the Vapour Validator >> >> It is my opinion that this ontology could have been (and could still be >> modified to) implemented in a way that followed LOD best practices. >> >> My concern is that other groups like the beetle people >> (Coleopterologists) etc. would see the HAO ontology and assume that they >> should also use OBO. >> > > How about using URI Debugger [1] to iron out the Linked Data principles > concerns. > > Start here: > http://linkeddata.informatik.**hu-berlin.de/uridbg/index.php?** > url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%**2Fobo%2Fowl%2FHAO%23HAO_** > 0000000&useragentheader=&**acceptheader=<http://linkeddata.informatik.hu-berlin.de/uridbg/index.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fobo%2Fowl%2FHAO%23HAO_0000000&useragentheader=&acceptheader=> > > Follow the 302 response "Location:" value, note what's returned compared > to actual mime type in response headers. > > Example: > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:11:06 GMT > Server: Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) > Last-Modified: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:53:47 GMT > ETag: "10c0630-4bfb71-4b993b94cecc0" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 4979569 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Vary: Accept-Encoding > > But the actual content is RDF/XML . > > Play around with different mime types via "Accept:" when alternative > representation requests etc.. Example re. Turtle request: > > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:11:46 GMT > Server: Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) > Last-Modified: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:53:47 GMT > ETag: "10c0630-4bfb71-4b993b94cecc0" > Accept-Ranges: bytes > Content-Length: 4979569 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Vary: Accept-Encoding > > But actual content is RDF/XML . > > > I think this is the place where Linked Data problems are arising. > > Links: > > 1. http://linkeddata.informatik.**hu-berlin.de/uridbg/<http://linkeddata.informatik.hu-berlin.de/uridbg/>-- URI Debugger . > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder& CEO > > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen> > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/about<https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about> > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen> > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:19:13 UTC