- From: Kerstin Forsberg <kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:43:15 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "mcourtot@gmail.com" <mcourtot@gmail.com>
- Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <FBA4A24C-DA33-4658-81A9-BE928C018CDF@gmail.com>
Hi Alan and Melaine, I think you could provide some clarity to the discussion below. I spontaneously think about MIREOT - Minimum information to reference an external ontology term http://obi-ontology.org/page/MIREOT And, I also wonder if Bernard Vatant's proposal for 5-stars of link vocabolaries is applicacable also for OBO foundry based ontolgies? http://blog.hubjects.com/2012/02/is-your-linked-data-vocabulary-5-star_9588.html Kind regards Kerstin Forsberg @kerfors 21 feb 2012 kl. 21:51 skrev Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>: > Hi Juan, > > Thanks for this. I read the paper. They have an "OWL" version of this OBO vocabulary but it seems to not be a fully mapped OWL version as described in your paper. > > In this particular use case I was thinking of applying the terms and properties described by the ontology to my species concepts. > > For instance: > > species X has this metabolic pathway. (which would be useful for finding species with potential drug interactions or other chemical reactions) > > I don't think this use case requires the full OBO relationships, just a mapping ontology that connects terms and characters to those in the OBO ontology. > > Doing it this way you might get a species "tagged" with something that is not appropriate but that could be detected by some service that analyzes the statements made > in the species concept markup. > > My guess is that some of the OBO ontologies (if fully entailed) will not play well on the LOD cloud, but they would play a useful role when mapped as I described. > > Does my interpretation seem appropriate to you or am I missing something? > > Thanks, > > - Pete > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter > > You may want to take a look at this: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21388572 > > The implementation of the OBO to OWL mapping work is part of official Gene Ontology project. > > Juan Sequeda > +1-575-SEQ-UEDA > www.juansequeda.com > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com> wrote: > How do OBO type ontologies work in the Linked Open Data cloud. > > One that I recently loaded has a large number of blank nodes. > > It the idea that these will be mapped to LOD URI's? > > Thanks, > > - Pete > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Pete DeVries > Department of Entomology > University of Wisconsin - Madison > 445 Russell Laboratories > 1630 Linden Drive > Madison, WI 53706 > Email: pdevries@wisc.edu > TaxonConcept & GeoSpecies Knowledge Bases > A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data Project > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Pete DeVries > Department of Entomology > University of Wisconsin - Madison > 445 Russell Laboratories > 1630 Linden Drive > Madison, WI 53706 > Email: pdevries@wisc.edu > TaxonConcept & GeoSpecies Knowledge Bases > A Semantic Web, Linked Open Data Project > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 23:44:39 UTC